Skip to content
Australian Government - Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Advancing the interests of Australia and Australians internationally

Australian Government - Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Advancing the interests of Australia and Australians internationally

Australian Safeguards and Non-Proliferation Office

Annual Report 1999-2000

Background

Brief Outline of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Currently there are more than 430 nuclear power reactors in operation in over 30 countries worldwide. In many cases they supply a substantial proportion of national electricity requirementssee Table 8 on page 83.

Reactor types

The majority of the worlds power reactors are of the light water type (LWRslight water reactors), where ordinary water acts as both moderator, slowing down neutrons to efficient speeds for nuclear fission to occur, and coolant, transferring heat from the nuclear reaction to steam generators for producing electricity.

Because ordinary water is an inefficient moderator, LWRs must be operated on enriched uranium, that is, uranium in which the proportion of the fissile isotope U-235 has been increased from the level in natural uranium, 0.71%, usually to between 3 and 5%. Some reactor types can be operated on natural uranium, by using more efficient moderators, such as heavy water, which has a proportion of the heavier hydrogen isotope deuterium, and graphite. Typical examples of this type of reactor are the Canadian CANDU, which is moderated and cooled by heavy water, and gas-cooled graphite-moderated reactors such as the UK Magnox.

Fuel cycle stages

Following mining and milling of uranium and production of uranium ore concentrates (yellowcake), the stages of the light water fuel cycle are as follows (see Figure 4 page 82):

  • Conversion:  natural uranium is formed into a gaseous compound, uranium hexafluoride (UF6), prior to enrichment;
  • Enrichment:  a process by which the proportion of the U-235 content is increased. The main technologies in use are gaseous diffusion and centrifuge. The product is described as low enriched uranium (LEU), containing between 3 and 5% U-235;
  • Fabrication:  manufacture of LEU into uranium oxide fuel pellets, which are assembled into fuel rods and then fuel elements for use in a reactor;
  • Reactors:  a power reactor uses the heat from a controlled nuclear chain reaction to drive a turbine to generate electricity. Typically the turbine(s) is driven by steam. In the case of pressurised water reactors as well as liquid metal-cooled reactors and some gas-cooled reactors, steam for the turbines is produced in a secondary circuit. There are some high-temperature gas-cooled reactors where the generating turbine is gas-driven.

In a typical LWR fuel elements are used over 3-4 operating cycles each of 12-18 months (i.e. the reactor might be unloaded every 12 months, with a third of the core being replaced each time);

  • Reprocessing:  spent fuel is dissolved for the separation of highly radioactive fission products, and for the recovery of plutonium and uranium. Uranium can be re-enriched for further reactor use. Plutonium is mixed with uranium to produce MOX (mixed oxide) fuel and used both in LWRs and potentially in fast breeder or fast neutron reactors.

Partly because depressed uranium prices are impacting on the economics of reprocessing, a number of countries have committed to, or are considering, the once-through cycle, where spent fuel will be disposed of without reprocessing.

Military fuel cycle

There are five acknowledged nuclear-weapon States (US, Russia, UK, France and China) and three threshold States, two of which have conducted nuclear explosive tests (India and Pakistan) and one which is suspected of having a nuclear weapon capability (Israel). In all cases the military nuclear programs developed ahead of civil power programs. Military programs involve the production of special grades of nuclear material, substantially different to the material used in civil programs.

Nuclear weapons are based on the following nuclear materials:

Plutonium: Plutonium is formed through the irradiation of uranium in a reactor. The uranium-238 isotope absorbs a neutron, leading to the formation of plutonium-239. Longer irradiation times lead to the formation of higher plutonium isotopes, Pu-240, Pu‑241 and Pu-242.

Weapons-grade plutonium predominantly comprises the isotope Pu-239 and contains no more than 7% of the isotope Pu-240. Pu-240 (and the higher isotope Pu-242) are undesirable for weapons purposes because their rate of spontaneous fission causes pre-initiation (a premature chain reaction). By contrast, reactor-grade plutoniumfrom the normal operation of a LWR contains high levels of Pu-240, typically around 25%.

Because of the need to minimise the Pu-240 content, weapons-grade plutonium is produced in dedicated plutonium production reactors, usually natural uranium-fuelled, graphite-moderated, where irradiated fuel can be removed after short irradiation times (i.e. at low burn-up levels).

Uranium: Uranium used in nuclear weapons is very highly enrichedweapons-grade uranium is 93% U-235. This compares with normal civil enrichment levels of around 3-5% U-235. High enrichment levels are produced in enrichment plants specially designed and operated for this purpose.

Table 7 Comparison of Materials in Civil and Military Nuclear Fuel Cycles. Figures are approximate

Material

Civil

Military

Plutonium

60% Pu-239

93% Pu-239

Uranium

4% U-235

93% U-235

The US, Russia, UK and France have announced that they have ceased production of fissile material for nuclear weapons purposes, and China is believed to have done so. Australia is a strong supporter of a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) under which this situation will be formalised, and extended to India, Israel and Pakistan. The FMCT will prohibit production of fissile material for weapons purposes, and will provide for verification on relevant facilities and material.

Figure 4 Civil Nuclear Fuel Cycle-Outline

Some countries choose to dispose of their spent fuel in repositories instead of recycling it.

Table 8 World Nuclear Electricity Generation at 31 December 1999

Country

Operating

Capacity

% of Total

Reactors under construction

 

Reactors

(GWe)

Electricity in 1999

Number

(GWe)

World total

433

349.0

(est) 16.0

41

34.4

*USA

104

97.1

19.8

 

 

*France

59

63.1

75.0

 

 

*Japan

53

43.7

35.9

4

4.5

*Germany

19

21.1

31.2

 

 

Russia

29

19.8

14.4

3

2.8

*ROK

16

13.0

42.8

 

 

*UK

35

13.0

28.9

 

 

Ukraine

14

12.2

43.8

4

3.8

*Canada

14

10.0

12.4

 

 

*Sweden

11

9.4

46.8

 

 

*Spain

9

7.5

31.0

 

 

*Belgium

7

5.7

57.7

 

 

Taiwan, China

6

4.9

24.8

2

2.7

Bulgaria

6

3.5

47.1

 

 

*Switzerland

5

3.1

36.0

 

 

*Finland

4

2.7

33.0

 

 

Lithuania

2

2.4

73.1

4

4.5

China

3

2.2

1.2

7

5.4

Slovak Republic

6

2.4

47.0

2

0.8

South Africa

2

1.8

7.1

2

0.8

India

11

1.9

2.7

3

0.6

Hungary

4

1.7

38.3

 

 

Czech Republic

4

1.6

20.8

2

1.8

*Mexico

2

1.3

5.2

4

3.8

Argentina

2

0.9

9.0

1

0.7

Romania

1

0.7

10.7

1

0.7

Slovenia

1

0.6

37.2

 

 

Brazil

1

0.6

1.1

1

1.2

*Netherlands

1

0.4

4.0

 

 

Armenia

1

0.4

36.4

 

 

Pakistan

1

0.1

0.1

1

0.3

* Eligible to use Australian uranium. Countries eligible to use Australian uranium operate 339 power reactors, accounting for around 83% of world nuclear generating capacity.

Source: IAEA Press Release 00/9, 6 March 2000

(http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Press/P_release/2000/99npptable.shtml)

Return to the ASNO Annual Report Index | The IAEAs Safeguards Statement for 1999

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade