Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Indonesia
Download print version
Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Indonesia [PDF 21 KB]
World Trade Organization
6 March 2014
The following communication, dated 3 March 2014, from the delegation of Indonesia to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 6.2 of the DSU.
On 20 September 2013, the Government of Indonesia requested consultations with the
Government of Australia pursuant to Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes ('DSU'), Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade 1994 ('GATT 1994'), Article 64.1 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights ('TRIPs Agreement'), and Article 14.1 of the Agreement on Technical
Barriers to Trade ('TBT Agreement') with respect to certain Australian laws and regulations that
impose restrictions on trademarks, geographical indications, and other plain packaging
requirements on tobacco products and packaging.
Consultations were held on 29 October 2013 with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory
solution. These consultations clarified certain issues pertaining to this matter, but failed to resolve the dispute. Therefore, Indonesia respectfully requests, pursuant to Articles 4.7 and 6 of the DSU, Article XXIII of GATT 1994, Article 64.1 of the TRIPs Agreement, and Article 14.1 of the TBT Agreement, that the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") establish a Panel to examine this matter. Indonesia asks that this request be placed on the agenda of the DSB meeting to be held on 26 March 2014. Indonesia further requests that the Penal have the standard terms of reference, as set forth in Article 7.1 of the DSU.
A. Specific measures at issue
This request for establishment of a Panel concerns the following measures:
- Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011, Act No. 148 of 2011, 'An Act to discourage the use
of tobacco products, and for related purposes';
- Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011 (Select Legislative Instrument 2011, No. 263), as amended by the Tobacco Plain Packaging Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1) (Select Legislative Instrument 2012, No. 29);
- Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Act 2011, Act No. 149 of 2011, "An Act to amend the Trade Marks Act 1995, and for related purposes"; and
- Any related measures adopted by Australia, including measures that implement, complement or add to these laws and regulations, as well as any measures that amend or replace these laws and regulations.
The measures apply to the retail sale of cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco products. The
measures establish comprehensive requirements regarding the appearance and form of the retail
packaging of tobacco products, as well as the tobacco products themselves. The measures also establish penalties, including criminal sanctions, for the violation of these requirements. The
measures require, inter alia, the following:
- With respect to the retail packaging of tobacco products, the measures (i) regulate the
appearance of trademarks and geographical indications, including by prohibiting the display of design and figurative features, including those forming part of these intellectual property rights; (ii) prescribe that the brand and variant names forming part of trademarks appear on the front face, top and bottom of the package in a uniform typeface, font, size, color, and placement1; (iii) prohibit the display of other words (except for basic information, including country of origin and manufacturer contact details); and (iv) mandate a matt finish and drab dark brown color (Pantone 448C) for retail packaging;
- the measures establish that individual cigarettes may not display trademarks, geographical indications or any other marking other than an alphanumeric code for product identification purposes;
- the measures provide that individual cigars may carry: the brand name, variant name, country of origin, and an alphanumeric code; these must be displayed in a uniform typeface, font, size, and color on a single band in a drab dark brown color (Pantone 448C)2; and
- the measures regulate other aspects of both tobacco packaging and tobacco products, such as the following requirements: (i) a retail package for cigarettes must be in a prescribed size, form and material; (ii) cigarettes must be white3; and (iii) a cigar tube must be cylindrical, rigid, and have an opening of at least 15 mm.
B. Legal basis of the Complaint
These measures regulating the plain packaging and appearance of tobacco products for retail sale appear to be inconsistent with Australia's obligations under the following provisions of the
TBT Agreement, the TRIPS Agreement, and the GATT 1994:
- Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement, because the technical regulations at issue accord to
imported tobacco products treatment less favorable than that accorded to like products of national origin;
- Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement, because the technical regulations at issue create unnecessary obstacles to trade because they are more trade-restrictive than necessary to fulfill a legitimate objective;
- Article 1.1 of the TRIPS Agreement, because Australia has failed to give effect to the
following provisions of the TRIPS Agreement;
- Article 2.1 of the TRIPS Agreement, which incorporates the provisions of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, as amended by the Stockholm Act of 1967 ('Paris Convention'), in particular, (i) Article 6quinquies of the Paris Convention, because trademarks registered in a country of origin outside Australia are not protected "as is"; and, (ii) Article 10bis of the Paris Convention, because Australia does not provide effective protection against unfair competition, for example, creating confusion between the goods of competitors;
- Article 3.1 of the TRIPS Agreement, because Australia accords to nationals of other Members treatment less favorable than it accords to its own nationals with respect to the protection of intellectual property;
- Article 15.4 of the TRIPS Agreement, because the nature of the goods to which a trademark is to be applied forms an obstacle to the registration of the trademark;
- Article 16.1 of the TRIPS Agreement, because the measures prevent owners of registered trademarks from enjoying the rights conferred by a trademark;
- Article 16.3 of the TRIPS Agreement, because the measures prevent owners of registered trademarks that are "well known" or might become "well known" from enjoying the rights conferred by a trademark;
- Article 20 of the TRIPS Agreement, because the use of trademarks in relation to tobacco products is unjustifiably encumbered by special requirements, such as (i) use in a special form, for example, the uniform typeface, font, size, color, and placement of the brand name, and, (ii) use in a manner detrimental to the trademark's capability to distinguish tobacco products of one undertaking from tobacco products of other undertakings;
- Article 22.2(b) of the TRIPS Agreement, because Australia does not provide effective protection against acts of unfair competition with respect to geographical indications, for example, creating confusion among consumers with respect to the origin of goods;
- Article 24.3 of the TRIPS Agreement, because Australia is diminishing the level of protection it affords to geographical indications as compared with the level of protection that existed prior to 1 January 1995; and
- Article III:4 of the GATT 1994, because the measures at issue accord to imported tobacco products treatment less favorable than that accorded to like products of national origin.
Request for the Establishment of a Panel
Accordingly, Indonesia requests, pursuant to Article 4.7 and 6 of the DSU, Article XXIII of GATT 1994, Article 64.1 of the TRIPs Agreement, and Article 14.1 of the TBT Agreement, that the
DSB establish a Panel with the standard terms of reference as set out in Article 7.1 of the DSU.
Indonesia asks that this request be placed on the agenda of the meeting of the DSB scheduled for
26 March 2014.