ASNO Annual Report 2010-2011
At 30 June 2011, there were 70 states (plus Taiwan) with significant nuclear activities[33]. Of these states, five were nuclear weapon states (NWS), 62 were non-nuclear-weapon states (NNWS) party to the NPT, and four were non-NPT Parties.
In the following tables, states with significant nuclear activities are shown in bold.
At 30 June 2011, there were a total of 109 states with an Additional Protocol in force, an increase of eight over the same time last year. Of the 62 NNWS NPT Parties with significant nuclear activities, 48 had an Additional Protocol in force (Table 18).
Table 18: States with Additional Protocols in force at 30 June 2011
State | |||
---|---|---|---|
Afghanistan | Ecuador | Libya | Portugal |
Albania | El Salvador | Lithuania | Republic of Korea |
Angola | Estonia | Luxembourg | Romania |
Armenia | Fiji | Madagascar | Russia |
Australia | Finland | Malawi | Rwanda |
Austria | France | Mali | Seychelles |
Azerbaijan | FYROM | Malta | Singapore |
Bangladesh | Gabon | Marshall Islands | Slovakia |
Belgium | Georgia | Mauritania | Slovenia |
Botswana | Germany | Mauritius | South Africa |
Bulgaria | Ghana | Mexico | Spain |
Burkina Faso | Greece | Monaco | Swaziland |
Burundi | Guatemala | Mongolia | Sweden |
Canada | Haiti | Montenegro | Switzerland |
Central African Rep | Holy See | Morocco | Tajikistan |
Chad | Hungary | Mozambique | Tanzania |
Chile | Iceland | Netherlands | Turkey |
China | Indonesia | New Zealand | Turkmenistan |
Colombia | Ireland | Nicaragua | Uganda |
Comoros | Italy | Niger | Ukraine |
Costa Rica | Jamaica | Nigeria | United Arab Emirates |
Croatia | Japan | Norway | United Kingdom |
Cuba | Jordan | Palau | Uruguay |
Cyprus | Kazakhstan | Panama | USA |
Czech Republic | Kenya | Paraguay | Uzbekistan |
DR Congo | Kuwait | Peru | |
Denmark | Latvia | Philippines | |
Dominique Republic | Lesotho | Poland | |
TOTAL: 109 states (including 48 NNWS with significant nuclear activities), plus Taiwan |
Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/sg_protocol.html)
At 30 June 2011, 31 states did not have an Additional Protocol (AP) in force but had signed an AP and or had an AP approved by the IAEA Board of Governors. During the period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 a further four states either signed or had the Board of Governors approve an AP, two of which also brought their AP into force during the period (Table 19).
Table 19: States with an ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL signed or approved but not in force at 30 June 2011
State | |||
---|---|---|---|
Algeria | Côte d'Ivoir | Kiribati | Thailand |
Andorra | Djibouti | Kyrgyzstan | Timor-Leste |
Bahrain | The Gambia | Liechtenstein | Togo |
Belarus | Guinea | Malaysia | Tunisia |
Benin | Honduras | Moldova | Vanuatu |
Cameroon | India (non-NPT) | Namibia | Vietnam |
Cape Verde | Iran (1) | Senegal | Zambia |
Congo, Rep of | Iraq | Serbia | |
TOTAL: 31 states (including 8 NNWS NPT Parties with significant nuclear activities) |
Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/documents/sir_table.pdf)
Note: (1) Iran implemented its AP 'provisionally' from 2003 but 'suspended' this in 2005.
The remaining six NNWS NPT Parties and two non-NPT states with significant nuclear activities had not signed an Additional Protocol.
Table 20: States with Significant Nuclear Activities and no AP at 30 June 2011[34]
State | |||
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | DPRK34 | Israel (non-NPT) | Syria |
Brazil | Egypt | Pakistan (non-NPT) | Venezuela |
TOTAL: 8 states (including 6 NPT Parties) |
Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/documents/sir_table.pdf)
[33] 'Significant nuclear activities' encompasses any amount of nuclear material in a facility or 'location outside a facility' (LOF), or nuclear material in excess of the exemption limits in INFCIRC/153 paragraph 37.
[34] On 10 January 2003, DPRK gave notice of withdrawal from the NPT. Pending clarification of its status, DPRK is counted here as an NPT Party.